Telegram under Fire: Exposing the Problems with the Most Divisive Messaging App in the World

Main Article Content

Ken Nohara

Abstract

Telegram has been hailed for more than ten years as a safe haven for uncensored communication, where users may express themselves without the limitations and content control common on other well-known social networking sites. With its promise of unparalleled user privacy, encryption, and little censorship, Telegram, founded in 2013 by Russian-born businessman Pavel Durov, became a rival to industry titans like Facebook Messenger and WhatsApp. Telegram's story has taken a darker turn in recent years, despite its initial celebration as a symbol of digital freedom, especially in areas where state-imposed limitations impede free speech. In addition to facilitating lawful free expression, its lax moderation guidelines, anonymity features, and encryption capabilities have created an environment favorable for criminal activity, extremist propaganda, misinformation campaigns, and various other illegal endeavors.With more than 800 million users, Telegram's worldwide impact is undeniable. Its rapid, mostly unchecked growth has made it a vital instrument for communication and a breeding ground for harmful information. Governments, law enforcement organizations, cybersecurity specialists, and human rights groups are alarmed by this dichotomy. However, the platform's supporters point to its ability to support political opposition, facilitate emergency communication in crises, and provide an online lifeline free from government monitoring to residents under repressive regimes. As a result, the argument is about more than just messaging app regulation; it is a stand-in for more significant disputes about digital rights, security, and the direction of global information networks.

Article Details

How to Cite
Nohara, K. . (2024). Telegram under Fire: Exposing the Problems with the Most Divisive Messaging App in the World. Journal of Artificial Intelligence General Science (JAIGS) ISSN:3006-4023, 1(1), 268–273. https://doi.org/10.60087/jaigs.v6i1.290
Section
Articles